10.46243/jst.2023.v8.i12.pp94-104 registered
ADVANCED NEURAL NETWORK ARCHITECTURE FOR DETECTING FRAUD IN INTERNET LOAN APPLICATIONS
Resolves to https://www.jst.org.in/index.php/pub/article/view/859
Held by Longman Publishers (India) · prefix 10.46243 live · DOI address https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2023.v8.i12.pp94-104
Registered 29 Sep 2026 via crossref · record version 2 · last change 29 Sep 2026, 11:59 PM · record sha256 cecb7f5a2c76625a…
Resolve ⬇ Record (JSON) ⬇ Kernel Metadata Declaration (XML) Compare with Crossref Cite (APA · BibTeX · RIS · CSL)
What the DOI identifies
JournalArticle — an article in a journal · Digital · Visual · en
ADVANCED NEURAL NETWORK ARCHITECTURE FOR DETECTING FRAUD IN INTERNET LOAN APPLICATIONS (PrincipalTitle)
Published 2023-12-12
Part of Journal of Science & Technology · ISSN 2456-5660 · volume 8 · issue 12 · pages 94–104
Agents
- P.Anil Jawalkar P.Anil Jawalkar (author)
- Longman Publishers (publisher)
Identifiers DOI 10.46243/jst.2023.v8.i12.pp94-104
Abstract
The background of the modernized loan approval system lies in the inefficiencies and limitations of traditional loan approval processes. The history of modernizing loan approval systems using machine learning techniques can be traced back to the early 2000s when financial institutions started exploring data-driven approaches to assess credit risks. With the growth of the internet and digitalization, lenders began collecting vast amounts of data on borrowers, including transaction history, social media activities, and online behavior. This data became valuable for predicting creditworthiness and revolutionized the way loans were approved. Traditional loan approval systems typically involved manual paperwork, face-to-face interviews, and subjective judgment. Loan officers would assess applicants based on credit scores, income statements, and collateral. The process was time-intensive and often led to delays in loan approvals. Moreover, these methods were not always accurate in predicting repayment capabilities, leading to higher default rates. In addition, existing methods were often time-consuming, paper-based, and relied heavily on human judgment, making them prone to errors and biases. With the advent of technology and the availability of vast amounts of data, there was a need to develop a more efficient, accurate, and unbiased loan approval system. This need gave rise to the use of machine learning techniques to predict loan approvals based on various factors and data points. Therefore, this research work proposes a machine learning model to develop accurate predictive models that can assess a borrower’s creditworthiness using diverse data sources. Further, the proposed model automates the loan approval process, which reduces the time taken for approval, enabling quicker disbursal of funds and it can analyze large datasets to make accurate predictions about a borrower’s creditworthiness. This also reduces the operational costs associated with manual loan processing and it will reduce biases in loan approval decisions, promoting fairness and equal opportunities
System metadata — ISO 26324:2025, Annex B · DOI Handbook 10.1
Each element by the standard's name (Annex B: reference elements, then administrative) and the Handbook's (in grey), read off the record above.
| Element | Value | In the record |
|---|---|---|
| DOI Name DOI name | 10.46243/jst.2023.v8.i12.pp94-104 | doi |
| Referent Type referentType | Creation | referent |
| Referent Sub-Type referentSubType | JournalArticle — an article in a journal | type |
| Referent Name(s) referentName(s) | ADVANCED NEURAL NETWORK ARCHITECTURE FOR DETECTING FRAUD IN INTERNET LOAN APPLICATIONS (PrincipalTitle, en) | titles |
| Basic Metadata basicMetadata | author: P.Anil Jawalkar P.Anil Jawalkar publisher: Longman Publishers published: 2023-12-12 part of: Journal of Science & Technology · ISSN 2456-5660 · vol. 8 · no. 12 · pp. 94–104 language: en form: Digital · Visual · Language | agents, dates, container, language, structural_type, modes, characters |
| Referent Identifier(s) alternateIdentifier(s) | none besides the DOI | identifiers, relations (IsSameAs) |
| Registration Authority registrationAuthorityCode | Crossref — issued by Crossref (member 25296); held here as a copy | record.source_agency (our code, ra_doi_name, for names issued here once appointed) |
| Created Date issueDate | 2024-02-16 | record.registered (when the DOI name was first registered) |
| relatedIdentifiers | none needed — the descriptive metadata is in this record | container, relations (only where the descriptive metadata lives at another identifier) |
complete Every System Metadata element is here, with the basic metadata a journal article needs.
The System Metadata Declaration (JSON) · the Kernel Metadata Declaration (XML) · what each sub-type needs
History — the ledger
Every change to this DOI, in order, as it was recorded. Entries are only ever added, never changed or removed.
| # | When | What | By | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29 Sep 2026, 10:00 PM | register registered at Crossref; record read from api.crossref.org | Administrator (admin) | 86 fields set · sha256 85ae8224565f… |
| 2 | 29 Sep 2026, 11:59 PM | update record re-read from api.crossref.org | Administrator (admin) | container.titles.0.value: |
Machine-readable: the history as JSON, with the full record after each change.
