Smart Scholars🛡 Scholar Shield🏛 Research Integrity Desk🧩 Portfolio Console📰 Journals🔧 DOI MembersTools🔎 Journal AuditGI GetIndexedDr DOI Doctor

10.46243/jst.2023.v8.i12.pp01-6 registered

A METHOD OF PREDICTING WITH MODELLING OF CYBER HACKING AND BREACHES

Resolves to https://www.jst.org.in/index.php/pub/article/view/817

Held by Longman Publishers (India) · prefix 10.46243 live · DOI address https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2023.v8.i12.pp01-6

Registered 29 Sep 2026 via crossref · record version 2 · last change 29 Sep 2026, 11:59 PM · record sha256 350c6b08eb5f345e…

Resolve ⬇ Record (JSON) ⬇ Kernel Metadata Declaration (XML) Compare with Crossref Cite (APA · BibTeX · RIS · CSL)

What the DOI identifies

JournalArticle — an article in a journal · Digital · Visual · en

A METHOD OF PREDICTING WITH MODELLING OF CYBER HACKING AND BREACHES (PrincipalTitle)

Published 2023-12-12

Part of Journal of Science & Technology · ISSN 2456-5660 · volume 8 · issue 12 · pages 1–6

Agents

  • D. Srinija D. Srinija (author)
  • Longman Publishers (publisher)

Identifiers DOI 10.46243/jst.2023.v8.i12.pp01-6

Abstract

and identity theft. a data breach occurs when a cybercriminal successfully infiltrates a data source and extracts sensitive information. this can be done physically by accessing a computer or network to steal local files or by bypassing network security remotely. data breaches are becoming more and more common and some of the most recent data breaches have been the largest on record to date. DATA breaches are one of the most devastating cyber incidents. The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse reports 7,730 data breaches between 2005 and 2017, accounting for 9,919,228,821 breached records. The Identity Theft Resource Center and Cyber Scout reports 1,093 data breach incidents in 2016, which is 40% higher than the 780 data breach incidents in 2015.Data breaches expose 4.1 billion records in first six month of 2019.the first six month of 2019 have seen more than 3800 publicly disclosed breaches 1,2,3B. Tech Student, Department of CSE (Cyber Security), Malla Reddy College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad, India. 4Professor, Department of CSE (Cyber Security), Malla Reddy College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad, India. DOI:https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2023.v8.i12.pp1-6 2 D. Srinija, K. Neeraj, C. Rajeshwari, Dr. P . Dileep: A METHOD OF PREDICTING WITH MODELLING OF CYBER HACKING AND BREACHES exposing an incredible 4.1 billion compromised records. In 2019,the number of data breaches in the united states amounted to 1,473 with over 164.68 million sensitive records exposed. data breaches have gained attention with the increasing use of digital files and companies and users large reliance on digital data. State of breach January 2020:at least 7.9 billion records, including credit card numbers, home addresses, phone numbers and other highly sensitive information, have been exposed through data breaches since 2019. EXISTING METHOD The present study is motivated by several questions that have not been investigated until now, such as: Are data breaches caused by cyber-attacks increasing, decreasing, or stabilizing? A principled answer to this question will give us a clear insight into the overall situation of cyber threats. This question was not answered by previous studies. Specifically, the dataset analyzed in only covered the time span from 2000 to 2008 and does not necessarily contain the breach incidents that are caused by cyber-attacks; the dataset analyzed in is more recent, but contains two kinds of incidents: negligent breaches (i.e., incidents caused by lost, discarded, stolen devices and other reasons) and malicious breaching. Since negligent breaches represent more human errors than cyber-attacks, we do not consider them in the present study. Because the malicious breaches studied in [9] contain four sub-categories: hacking (including malware), insider, payment card fraud, and unknown, this study will focus on the hacking sub-category (called hacking breach dataset thereafter), while noting that the other three subcategories are interesting on their own and should be analyzed separately.Recently, researchers started modeling data breach incidents. Maillart and Sornette studied the statistical properties of the personal identity losses in the United States between year 2000 and 2008. They found that the number of breach incidents dramatically increases from 2000 to July 2006 but remains stable thereafter. Edwards et al. analyzed a dataset containing 2,253 breach incidents that span over a decade (2005 to 2015). They found that neither the size nor the frequency of data breaches has increased over the years. Wheatley et al., analyzed a dataset that is combined from corresponds to organizational breach incidents between year 2000 and 2015. They found that the frequency of large breach incidents (i.e., the ones that breach more than 50,000 records) occurring to US firms is independent of time, but the frequency of large breach incidents occurring to non-US firms exhibits an increasing trend. PROPOSED SYSTEM In this paper, we make the following three contributions. First, we show that both the hacking breach incident inter arrival times (reflecting incident frequency) and breach sizes should be modeled by stochastic processes, rather than by distributions. We find that a particular point process can adequately describe the evolution of the hacking breach incidents inter-arrival times and that a particular ARMA-GARCH model can adequately describe the evolution of the hacking breach sizes, where ARMA is acronym for “Auto Regressive and Moving Average” and GARCH is acronym for “Generalized Auto Regressive Conditional Hetero skedasticity.” We show that these stochastic process models can predict the inter-arrival times and the breach sizes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper showing that stochastic processes, rather than distributions, should be used to model these cyber threat factors. Second, we disc

Licence https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

System metadata — ISO 26324:2025, Annex B · DOI Handbook 10.1

Each element by the standard's name (Annex B: reference elements, then administrative) and the Handbook's (in grey), read off the record above.

ElementValueIn the record
DOI Name
DOI name
10.46243/jst.2023.v8.i12.pp01-6doi
Referent Type
referentType
Creationreferent
Referent Sub-Type
referentSubType
JournalArticle — an article in a journaltype
Referent Name(s)
referentName(s)
A METHOD OF PREDICTING WITH MODELLING OF CYBER HACKING AND BREACHES (PrincipalTitle, en)titles
Basic Metadata
basicMetadata
author: D. Srinija D. Srinija
publisher: Longman Publishers
published: 2023-12-12
part of: Journal of Science & Technology · ISSN 2456-5660 · vol. 8 · no. 12 · pp. 1–6
language: en
form: Digital · Visual · Language
agents, dates, container, language, structural_type, modes, characters
Referent Identifier(s)
alternateIdentifier(s)
none besides the DOIidentifiers, relations (IsSameAs)
Registration Authority
registrationAuthorityCode
Crossref — issued by Crossref (member 25296); held here as a copyrecord.source_agency (our code, ra_doi_name, for names issued here once appointed)
Created Date
issueDate
2024-02-16record.registered (when the DOI name was first registered)
relatedIdentifiersnone needed — the descriptive metadata is in this recordcontainer, relations (only where the descriptive metadata lives at another identifier)

complete Every System Metadata element is here, with the basic metadata a journal article needs.

The System Metadata Declaration (JSON) · the Kernel Metadata Declaration (XML) · what each sub-type needs

History — the ledger

Every change to this DOI, in order, as it was recorded. Entries are only ever added, never changed or removed.

#WhenWhatByChanges
129 Sep 2026, 10:00 PMregister
registered at Crossref; record read from api.crossref.org
Administrator (admin) 86 fields set · sha256 341810e8e21f…
229 Sep 2026, 11:59 PMupdate
record re-read from api.crossref.org
Administrator (admin)
container.titles.0.value: Journal of Science & Technology → Journal of Science & Technology

Machine-readable: the history as JSON, with the full record after each change.

Everything Smart Scholars runsNine sites, one account. A journal starts at the audit; an author starts at Scholar Shield.

For journals & publishers

Start with the audit — it is free, and it is the gate to everything else.

DOI care

Nine services on one journal profile — each previews first and acts only on your approval.

For authors & researchers

Free to use. Nothing you check is shared with the journal.

For institutions, sponsors & DOI operators

Smart Scholars

Mon–Sat, 10:00–19:00 IST. The Ask AI button on every page answers about our services at any hour.

News

Policies

What we can register a DOI for

20 kinds of record, one account, one place. Every one gets a DOI that resolves, metadata that indexes read, and a record that stays correct afterwards.
Journals
  • Journal articles
  • Journal titles
  • Pending publications
  • Peer reviews
  • Preprints & posted content
Books & conferences
  • Books
  • Book chapters
  • Book series
  • Book sets
  • Conference proceedings
  • Proceedings series
  • Conference papers
Other research output
  • Theses & dissertations
  • Reports & working papers
  • Report series
  • Standards
  • Databases
  • Datasets
  • Figures, tables & supplements
Funding
  • Grants & funding awards

Elsewhere

The same company, in the places our publishers already read.
Smart Scholars · Every service on one pageData from OpenAlex (openalex.org), CC0 · Crossref · ISSN Portal · DOAJContact
WhatsApp