10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i02.pp146-153 registered
TWITTER STATISTICS EMOTION EVALUATION EVALUATION OF DEEP LEARNING METHODS
Resolves to https://www.jst.org.in/index.php/pub/article/view/681
Held by Longman Publishers (India) · prefix 10.46243 live · DOI address https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i02.pp146-153
Registered 29 Sep 2026 via crossref · record version 2 · last change 30 Sep 2026, 12:00 AM · record sha256 3ab48e27b04bed2b…
Resolve ⬇ Record (JSON) ⬇ Kernel Metadata Declaration (XML) Compare with Crossref Cite (APA · BibTeX · RIS · CSL)
What the DOI identifies
JournalArticle — an article in a journal · Digital · Visual · en
TWITTER STATISTICS EMOTION EVALUATION EVALUATION OF DEEP LEARNING METHODS (PrincipalTitle)
Published 2021-05-01
Part of Journal of Science & Technology · ISSN 2456-5660 · volume 06 · issue 03 · pages 146–153
Agents
- Dr.P.JOHN PAUL (author)
- N.KALYAN GOUD (author)
- SAMYA BADAVATH (author)
- Longman Publishers (publisher)
Identifiers DOI 10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i02.pp146-153
Abstract
This analysis compares and contrasts a variety of methods for assessing emotions in Twitter data. Deep learning (DL) methods have gained momentum in this field among academics, who collaborate on a level playing field to tackle a wide variety of problems. CNNs, which are used to locate pictures, and recurrent neural networks (RNNs), which may be utilized successfully in natural language processing (NLP), are two types of neural networks. For this reason, two types of neural networks are explicitly utilized. These images are used to assess and compare CNN ensembles and variants, as well as RNN category networks with long-term memory (LSTM). We also associate clothing with the type phrase embedding structures Word2Vec and the global phrase representation vectors (Glove). To put these methods to the test, we utilized information from the Seminal (Seminal), one of the most well-known international workshops on the internet. Different trials and combinations are used, and the better results for each variation are linked to their average efficiency. This study adds to the area of sentiment analysis by assessing the outcomes, benefits, and drawbacks of various methods using an evaluation method that use a single testing system for the same dataset and machine configuration.
System metadata — ISO 26324:2025, Annex B · DOI Handbook 10.1
Each element by the standard's name (Annex B: reference elements, then administrative) and the Handbook's (in grey), read off the record above.
| Element | Value | In the record |
|---|---|---|
| DOI Name DOI name | 10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i02.pp146-153 | doi |
| Referent Type referentType | Creation | referent |
| Referent Sub-Type referentSubType | JournalArticle — an article in a journal | type |
| Referent Name(s) referentName(s) | TWITTER STATISTICS EMOTION EVALUATION EVALUATION OF DEEP LEARNING METHODS (PrincipalTitle, en) | titles |
| Basic Metadata basicMetadata | author: Dr.P.JOHN PAUL author: N.KALYAN GOUD author: SAMYA BADAVATH publisher: Longman Publishers published: 2021-05-01 part of: Journal of Science & Technology · ISSN 2456-5660 · vol. 06 · no. 03 · pp. 146–153 language: en form: Digital · Visual · Language | agents, dates, container, language, structural_type, modes, characters |
| Referent Identifier(s) alternateIdentifier(s) | none besides the DOI | identifiers, relations (IsSameAs) |
| Registration Authority registrationAuthorityCode | Crossref — issued by Crossref (member 25296); held here as a copy | record.source_agency (our code, ra_doi_name, for names issued here once appointed) |
| Created Date issueDate | 2026-09-12 | record.registered (when the DOI name was first registered) |
| relatedIdentifiers | none needed — the descriptive metadata is in this record | container, relations (only where the descriptive metadata lives at another identifier) |
complete Every System Metadata element is here, with the basic metadata a journal article needs.
The System Metadata Declaration (JSON) · the Kernel Metadata Declaration (XML) · what each sub-type needs
History — the ledger
Every change to this DOI, in order, as it was recorded. Entries are only ever added, never changed or removed.
| # | When | What | By | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29 Sep 2026, 10:00 PM | register registered at Crossref; record read from api.crossref.org | Administrator (admin) | 84 fields set · sha256 33b992b68ceb… |
| 2 | 30 Sep 2026, 12:00 AM | update record re-read from api.crossref.org | Administrator (admin) | container.titles.0.value: |
Machine-readable: the history as JSON, with the full record after each change.
