Cite this DOI

V David, & D Rajeev Naik (2021). ENGINEERING EDUCATION – IS PROBLEMBASED OR PROJECT-BASED LEARNING THE ANSWER?. *Journal of Science & Technology*, *06*(06), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i06.pp193-205

@article{vdavid2021engineering,
  author    = {V David and D Rajeev Naik},
  title     = {{ENGINEERING EDUCATION – IS PROBLEMBASED OR PROJECT-BASED LEARNING THE ANSWER?}},
  journal   = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
  year      = {2021},
  month     = {dec},
  volume    = {06},
  number    = {06},
  pages     = {193--205},
  publisher = {Longman Publishers},
  issn      = {2456-5660},
  doi       = {10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i06.pp193-205},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i06.pp193-205},
  language  = {en},
  abstract  = {The dominant pedagogy for engineering education still remains ‚chalk and talk‛, despite the large body of education research that demonstrates its ineffectiveness. In recent years, the engineering profession and the bodies responsible for accrediting engineering programs have called for change. This paper discusses the application of problem-based and project-based learning to engineering education, examines the difference between them. It reviews some examples of where they have been used to date and discusses the effectiveness and relevance of each method for engineering education.}
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - ENGINEERING EDUCATION – IS PROBLEMBASED OR PROJECT-BASED LEARNING THE ANSWER?
AU  - V David
AU  - D Rajeev Naik
JO  - Journal of Science & Technology
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/12/28/
VL  - 06
IS  - 06
SP  - 193
EP  - 205
PB  - Longman Publishers
SN  - 2456-5660
LA  - en
AB  - The dominant pedagogy for engineering education still remains ‚chalk and talk‛, despite the large body of education research that demonstrates its ineffectiveness. In recent years, the engineering profession and the bodies responsible for accrediting engineering programs have called for change. This paper discusses the application of problem-based and project-based learning to engineering education, examines the difference between them. It reviews some examples of where they have been used to date and discusses the effectiveness and relevance of each method for engineering education.
DO  - 10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i06.pp193-205
UR  - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i06.pp193-205
ER  -

{
    "type": "article-journal",
    "id": "10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i06.pp193-205",
    "DOI": "10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i06.pp193-205",
    "URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i06.pp193-205",
    "title": "ENGINEERING EDUCATION – IS PROBLEMBASED OR PROJECT-BASED LEARNING THE ANSWER?",
    "source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
    "container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
    "author": [
        {
            "family": "V David"
        },
        {
            "family": "D Rajeev Naik"
        }
    ],
    "issued": {
        "date-parts": [
            [
                2021,
                12,
                28
            ]
        ]
    },
    "volume": "06",
    "issue": "06",
    "page": "193-205",
    "publisher": "Longman Publishers",
    "language": "en",
    "abstract": "The dominant pedagogy for engineering education still remains ‚chalk and talk‛, despite the large body of education research that demonstrates its ineffectiveness. In recent years, the engineering profession and the bodies responsible for accrediting engineering programs have called for change. This paper discusses the application of problem-based and project-based learning to engineering education, examines the difference between them. It reviews some examples of where they have been used to date and discusses the effectiveness and relevance of each method for engineering education.",
    "ISSN": "2456-5660"
}

From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2021.v6.i06.pp193-205 gives all four in one JSON answer.