Cite this DOI

Bhaskar K.Nikam, Vilas B. Jadhav, & Mahendra S. Borse (2025). “Analysing the Energetics of Phase Separation in Non-Ionic Surfactant Brij-30: Investigating the Influence of Head Group Gathering”. *Journal of Science & Technology*, *10*(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2025.v10.i04.pp01-26

@article{bhaskarknikam2025analysing,
  author    = {Bhaskar K.Nikam and Vilas B. Jadhav and Mahendra S. Borse},
  title     = {{“Analysing the Energetics of Phase Separation in Non-Ionic Surfactant Brij-30: Investigating the Influence of Head Group Gathering”.}},
  journal   = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
  year      = {2025},
  month     = {apr},
  volume    = {10},
  number    = {4},
  pages     = {1--26},
  publisher = {Longman Publishers},
  issn      = {2456-5660},
  doi       = {10.46243/jst.2025.v10.i04.pp01-26},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2025.v10.i04.pp01-26},
  abstract  = {The main motto of this paper was to study how the hydrophilic surfactant head groupgathering affects the phase behavior of a 22\% alcoholic solution of a non-ionic surfactant,Polyoxyethylene (4) lauryl ether (Brij-30) and hydroxyl amine mixtures at different concentrations.Our conclusions show that the hydrophilic part of the surfactant suppresses the system'spropensity to undergo phase separation, an increased sensitivity due to the presence of hydroxylamines. The CP decreases with an increasing concentration of mono, di, and Triethanolamine in a22\% alcoholic solution of Brij 30 surfactant. CP increases with concentration in methylethanolamine while decreases in diethanolamine with concentration the same trend is observed inthe case of methyl diethanolamine and triethanolamine. Generally, ethanolic groups exhibit anincrease in Cloud Point (CP) with increased alkyl branching. The amines in ethanolamine showvariation in CP by integrating into the head region with proton-rich amine groups at the micelleinterface. By utilizing the traditional thermodynamic model for phase separation, we assessed thevarious corresponding energy parameters.Amongst all instances, we found that all the parameters fluctuated based on non-ionicsurfactant type, its micellar concentration, and the involvement of hydroxyl amine in the aqueousmedium. All the experimental findings are consistent because phase separation occurs due todecreased hydration of the surfactant head group induced by elevated temperature.}
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - “Analysing the Energetics of Phase Separation in Non-Ionic Surfactant Brij-30: Investigating the Influence of Head Group Gathering”.
AU  - Bhaskar K.Nikam
AU  - Vilas B. Jadhav
AU  - Mahendra S. Borse
JO  - Journal of Science & Technology
PY  - 2025
DA  - 2025/04/08/
VL  - 10
IS  - 4
SP  - 1
EP  - 26
PB  - Longman Publishers
SN  - 2456-5660
AB  - The main motto of this paper was to study how the hydrophilic surfactant head groupgathering affects the phase behavior of a 22% alcoholic solution of a non-ionic surfactant,Polyoxyethylene (4) lauryl ether (Brij-30) and hydroxyl amine mixtures at different concentrations.Our conclusions show that the hydrophilic part of the surfactant suppresses the system'spropensity to undergo phase separation, an increased sensitivity due to the presence of hydroxylamines. The CP decreases with an increasing concentration of mono, di, and Triethanolamine in a22% alcoholic solution of Brij 30 surfactant. CP increases with concentration in methylethanolamine while decreases in diethanolamine with concentration the same trend is observed inthe case of methyl diethanolamine and triethanolamine. Generally, ethanolic groups exhibit anincrease in Cloud Point (CP) with increased alkyl branching. The amines in ethanolamine showvariation in CP by integrating into the head region with proton-rich amine groups at the micelleinterface. By utilizing the traditional thermodynamic model for phase separation, we assessed thevarious corresponding energy parameters.Amongst all instances, we found that all the parameters fluctuated based on non-ionicsurfactant type, its micellar concentration, and the involvement of hydroxyl amine in the aqueousmedium. All the experimental findings are consistent because phase separation occurs due todecreased hydration of the surfactant head group induced by elevated temperature.
DO  - 10.46243/jst.2025.v10.i04.pp01-26
UR  - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2025.v10.i04.pp01-26
ER  -

{
    "type": "article-journal",
    "id": "10.46243/jst.2025.v10.i04.pp01-26",
    "DOI": "10.46243/jst.2025.v10.i04.pp01-26",
    "URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2025.v10.i04.pp01-26",
    "title": "“Analysing the Energetics of Phase Separation in Non-Ionic Surfactant Brij-30: Investigating the Influence of Head Group Gathering”.",
    "source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
    "container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
    "author": [
        {
            "family": "Bhaskar K.Nikam"
        },
        {
            "family": "Vilas B. Jadhav"
        },
        {
            "family": "Mahendra S. Borse"
        }
    ],
    "issued": {
        "date-parts": [
            [
                2025,
                4,
                8
            ]
        ]
    },
    "volume": "10",
    "issue": "4",
    "page": "1-26",
    "publisher": "Longman Publishers",
    "abstract": "The main motto of this paper was to study how the hydrophilic surfactant head groupgathering affects the phase behavior of a 22% alcoholic solution of a non-ionic surfactant,Polyoxyethylene (4) lauryl ether (Brij-30) and hydroxyl amine mixtures at different concentrations.Our conclusions show that the hydrophilic part of the surfactant suppresses the system'spropensity to undergo phase separation, an increased sensitivity due to the presence of hydroxylamines. The CP decreases with an increasing concentration of mono, di, and Triethanolamine in a22% alcoholic solution of Brij 30 surfactant. CP increases with concentration in methylethanolamine while decreases in diethanolamine with concentration the same trend is observed inthe case of methyl diethanolamine and triethanolamine. Generally, ethanolic groups exhibit anincrease in Cloud Point (CP) with increased alkyl branching. The amines in ethanolamine showvariation in CP by integrating into the head region with proton-rich amine groups at the micelleinterface. By utilizing the traditional thermodynamic model for phase separation, we assessed thevarious corresponding energy parameters.Amongst all instances, we found that all the parameters fluctuated based on non-ionicsurfactant type, its micellar concentration, and the involvement of hydroxyl amine in the aqueousmedium. All the experimental findings are consistent because phase separation occurs due todecreased hydration of the surfactant head group induced by elevated temperature.",
    "ISSN": "2456-5660"
}

From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2025.v10.i04.pp01-26 gives all four in one JSON answer.