Cite this DOI
10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i4.pp103-112 · Performance Evaluation of Approximate (8; 2) Compressor for Multipliers in Error-Resilient Image Processing Applications
APA (7th edition)
Dr.K.BabuRao, Z.NagaSivareddy, P.Aravind, & T.RakeshBabu (2024). Performance Evaluation of Approximate (8; 2) Compressor for Multipliers in Error-Resilient Image Processing Applications. *Journal of Science & Technology*, *09*(04), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i4.pp103-112
⬇ text Italics are shown as *asterisks* in plain text — the journal or book title and the volume.
BibTeX
@article{drkbaburao2024performance,
author = {Dr.K.BabuRao and Z.NagaSivareddy and P.Aravind and T.RakeshBabu},
title = {{Performance Evaluation of Approximate (8; 2) Compressor for Multipliers in Error-Resilient Image Processing Applications}},
journal = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
year = {2024},
month = {apr},
volume = {09},
number = {04},
pages = {103--112},
publisher = {Longman Publishers},
issn = {2456-5660},
doi = {10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i4.pp103-112},
url = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i4.pp103-112},
language = {en},
abstract = {Approximate computing improves performance in error-resilient applications like image andvideo processing. Multipliers are part of its computing unit, which frequently requires a large numberofresources.Thisstudycomparesanapproximation(8;2)compressortootherknownmodelsintermsof quality, power consumption, delay, and circuit area. The proposed approximation compressor isimplementedin8×8and16×16multipliers.Todemonstratethequalityofthesuggestedcompressor,an8×8approximationmultiplierwas utilizedtomultiplytwoimagesinMATLABtools.QualitativemeasuressuchasSSIMandPSNRwereexaminedandacceptableresultswereobtained. Thesuggested8×8multiplier circuitproducesan acceptableerrorrate,asindicatedbytheMEDandNEDaccuracycriteria. Finally, we used a Synopsys Design Compiler to synthesize the proposed approximationcompressorandmultiplierdesigns.Thesuggested16×16multiplierimproveslatency,area,andpowerdelayproductsby5\%,17\%,and8\%,respectively,comparedtosimilarcurrentapproximatemultipliers.}
}RIS (EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley)
TY - JOUR TI - Performance Evaluation of Approximate (8; 2) Compressor for Multipliers in Error-Resilient Image Processing Applications AU - Dr.K.BabuRao AU - Z.NagaSivareddy AU - P.Aravind AU - T.RakeshBabu JO - Journal of Science & Technology PY - 2024 DA - 2024/04/16/ VL - 09 IS - 04 SP - 103 EP - 112 PB - Longman Publishers SN - 2456-5660 LA - en AB - Approximate computing improves performance in error-resilient applications like image andvideo processing. Multipliers are part of its computing unit, which frequently requires a large numberofresources.Thisstudycomparesanapproximation(8;2)compressortootherknownmodelsintermsof quality, power consumption, delay, and circuit area. The proposed approximation compressor isimplementedin8×8and16×16multipliers.Todemonstratethequalityofthesuggestedcompressor,an8×8approximationmultiplierwas utilizedtomultiplytwoimagesinMATLABtools.QualitativemeasuressuchasSSIMandPSNRwereexaminedandacceptableresultswereobtained. Thesuggested8×8multiplier circuitproducesan acceptableerrorrate,asindicatedbytheMEDandNEDaccuracycriteria. Finally, we used a Synopsys Design Compiler to synthesize the proposed approximationcompressorandmultiplierdesigns.Thesuggested16×16multiplierimproveslatency,area,andpowerdelayproductsby5%,17%,and8%,respectively,comparedtosimilarcurrentapproximatemultipliers. DO - 10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i4.pp103-112 UR - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i4.pp103-112 ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"type": "article-journal",
"id": "10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i4.pp103-112",
"DOI": "10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i4.pp103-112",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i4.pp103-112",
"title": "Performance Evaluation of Approximate (8; 2) Compressor for Multipliers in Error-Resilient Image Processing Applications",
"source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
"container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Dr.K.BabuRao"
},
{
"family": "Z.NagaSivareddy"
},
{
"family": "P.Aravind"
},
{
"family": "T.RakeshBabu"
}
],
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2024,
4,
16
]
]
},
"volume": "09",
"issue": "04",
"page": "103-112",
"publisher": "Longman Publishers",
"language": "en",
"abstract": "Approximate computing improves performance in error-resilient applications like image andvideo processing. Multipliers are part of its computing unit, which frequently requires a large numberofresources.Thisstudycomparesanapproximation(8;2)compressortootherknownmodelsintermsof quality, power consumption, delay, and circuit area. The proposed approximation compressor isimplementedin8×8and16×16multipliers.Todemonstratethequalityofthesuggestedcompressor,an8×8approximationmultiplierwas utilizedtomultiplytwoimagesinMATLABtools.QualitativemeasuressuchasSSIMandPSNRwereexaminedandacceptableresultswereobtained. Thesuggested8×8multiplier circuitproducesan acceptableerrorrate,asindicatedbytheMEDandNEDaccuracycriteria. Finally, we used a Synopsys Design Compiler to synthesize the proposed approximationcompressorandmultiplierdesigns.Thesuggested16×16multiplierimproveslatency,area,andpowerdelayproductsby5%,17%,and8%,respectively,comparedtosimilarcurrentapproximatemultipliers.",
"ISSN": "2456-5660"
} ⬇ .json What citeproc and reference managers read; the DOI system hands it out for Accept: application/vnd.citationstyles.csl+json, and so does this registry's resolver.
From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2024.v9.i4.pp103-112 gives all four in one JSON answer.
