Smart Scholars🛡 Scholar Shield🏛 Research Integrity Desk🧩 Portfolio Console📰 Journals🔧 DOI MembersTools🔎 Journal AuditGI GetIndexedDr DOI Doctor

Cite this DOI

10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147 · Identifying Product Aspect Polarity by Product Review Classification with Dual Sentiment Analysis

APA (7th edition)

Lohia, D. H. (2024). Identifying Product Aspect Polarity by Product Review Classification with Dual Sentiment Analysis. *Journal of Science & Technology*, *9*(1), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147

⬇ text Italics are shown as *asterisks* in plain text — the journal or book title and the volume.

BibTeX

@article{lohia2024identifying,
  author    = {Lohia, Dr. Harsh},
  title     = {{Identifying Product Aspect Polarity by Product Review Classification with Dual Sentiment Analysis}},
  journal   = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
  year      = {2024},
  month     = {jan},
  volume    = {9},
  number    = {1},
  pages     = {139--147},
  publisher = {Longman Publishers},
  issn      = {2456-5660},
  doi       = {10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147},
  language  = {en},
  abstract  = {Dual Sentiment Analysis has emerged as a crucial and active research field. It involves extracting sentiment from comments, feedback, or critiques, which serves as valuable indicators for various purposes. To address this, we propose a novel dual training algorithm that utilizes both original and reversed training reviews to develop a robust sentiment classifier. Additionally, we introduce a dual prediction algorithm that comprehensively assesses both aspects of a review for classification during testing. The proposed approach goes beyond traditional polarity (positive-negative) classification by extending the framework to a 3-class system, which includes neutral reviews. This enhancement allows for a more nuanced understanding of sentiment. By considering neutral reviews, we gain deeper insights into the sentiment landscape. Dual Sentiment Analysis plays a pivotal role in helping companies gauge the level of acceptance of their products and formulate strategies to improve product quality. Moreover, it empowers policymakers and politicians to gain valuable insights by analyzing public sentiments on policies, public services, and political issues.}
}

⬇ .bib

RIS (EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley)

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Identifying Product Aspect Polarity by Product Review Classification with Dual Sentiment Analysis
AU  - Lohia, Dr. Harsh
JO  - Journal of Science & Technology
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/01/25/
VL  - 9
IS  - 1
SP  - 139
EP  - 147
PB  - Longman Publishers
SN  - 2456-5660
LA  - en
AB  - Dual Sentiment Analysis has emerged as a crucial and active research field. It involves extracting sentiment from comments, feedback, or critiques, which serves as valuable indicators for various purposes. To address this, we propose a novel dual training algorithm that utilizes both original and reversed training reviews to develop a robust sentiment classifier. Additionally, we introduce a dual prediction algorithm that comprehensively assesses both aspects of a review for classification during testing. The proposed approach goes beyond traditional polarity (positive-negative) classification by extending the framework to a 3-class system, which includes neutral reviews. This enhancement allows for a more nuanced understanding of sentiment. By considering neutral reviews, we gain deeper insights into the sentiment landscape. Dual Sentiment Analysis plays a pivotal role in helping companies gauge the level of acceptance of their products and formulate strategies to improve product quality. Moreover, it empowers policymakers and politicians to gain valuable insights by analyzing public sentiments on policies, public services, and political issues.
DO  - 10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147
UR  - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147
ER  -

⬇ .ris

CSL-JSON

{
    "type": "article-journal",
    "id": "10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147",
    "DOI": "10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147",
    "URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147",
    "title": "Identifying Product Aspect Polarity by Product Review Classification with Dual Sentiment Analysis",
    "source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
    "container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
    "author": [
        {
            "family": "Lohia",
            "given": "Dr. Harsh"
        }
    ],
    "issued": {
        "date-parts": [
            [
                2024,
                1,
                25
            ]
        ]
    },
    "volume": "9",
    "issue": "1",
    "page": "139-147",
    "publisher": "Longman Publishers",
    "language": "en",
    "abstract": "Dual Sentiment Analysis has emerged as a crucial and active research field. It involves extracting sentiment from comments, feedback, or critiques, which serves as valuable indicators for various purposes. To address this, we propose a novel dual training algorithm that utilizes both original and reversed training reviews to develop a robust sentiment classifier. Additionally, we introduce a dual prediction algorithm that comprehensively assesses both aspects of a review for classification during testing. The proposed approach goes beyond traditional polarity (positive-negative) classification by extending the framework to a 3-class system, which includes neutral reviews. This enhancement allows for a more nuanced understanding of sentiment. By considering neutral reviews, we gain deeper insights into the sentiment landscape. Dual Sentiment Analysis plays a pivotal role in helping companies gauge the level of acceptance of their products and formulate strategies to improve product quality. Moreover, it empowers policymakers and politicians to gain valuable insights by analyzing public sentiments on policies, public services, and political issues.",
    "ISSN": "2456-5660"
}

⬇ .json What citeproc and reference managers read; the DOI system hands it out for Accept: application/vnd.citationstyles.csl+json, and so does this registry's resolver.

From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147 gives all four in one JSON answer.

Everything Smart Scholars runsNine sites, one account. A journal starts at the audit; an author starts at Scholar Shield.

For journals & publishers

Start with the audit — it is free, and it is the gate to everything else.

DOI care

Nine services on one journal profile — each previews first and acts only on your approval.

For authors & researchers

Free to use. Nothing you check is shared with the journal.

For institutions, sponsors & DOI operators

Smart Scholars

Mon–Sat, 10:00–19:00 IST. The Ask AI button on every page answers about our services at any hour.

News

Policies

What we can register a DOI for

20 kinds of record, one account, one place. Every one gets a DOI that resolves, metadata that indexes read, and a record that stays correct afterwards.
Journals
  • Journal articles
  • Journal titles
  • Pending publications
  • Peer reviews
  • Preprints & posted content
Books & conferences
  • Books
  • Book chapters
  • Book series
  • Book sets
  • Conference proceedings
  • Proceedings series
  • Conference papers
Other research output
  • Theses & dissertations
  • Reports & working papers
  • Report series
  • Standards
  • Databases
  • Datasets
  • Figures, tables & supplements
Funding
  • Grants & funding awards

Elsewhere

The same company, in the places our publishers already read.
Smart Scholars · Every service on one pageData from OpenAlex (openalex.org), CC0 · Crossref · ISSN Portal · DOAJContact
WhatsApp