Cite this DOI
10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147 · Identifying Product Aspect Polarity by Product Review Classification with Dual Sentiment Analysis
APA (7th edition)
Lohia, D. H. (2024). Identifying Product Aspect Polarity by Product Review Classification with Dual Sentiment Analysis. *Journal of Science & Technology*, *9*(1), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147
⬇ text Italics are shown as *asterisks* in plain text — the journal or book title and the volume.
BibTeX
@article{lohia2024identifying,
author = {Lohia, Dr. Harsh},
title = {{Identifying Product Aspect Polarity by Product Review Classification with Dual Sentiment Analysis}},
journal = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
year = {2024},
month = {jan},
volume = {9},
number = {1},
pages = {139--147},
publisher = {Longman Publishers},
issn = {2456-5660},
doi = {10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147},
url = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147},
language = {en},
abstract = {Dual Sentiment Analysis has emerged as a crucial and active research field. It involves extracting sentiment from comments, feedback, or critiques, which serves as valuable indicators for various purposes. To address this, we propose a novel dual training algorithm that utilizes both original and reversed training reviews to develop a robust sentiment classifier. Additionally, we introduce a dual prediction algorithm that comprehensively assesses both aspects of a review for classification during testing. The proposed approach goes beyond traditional polarity (positive-negative) classification by extending the framework to a 3-class system, which includes neutral reviews. This enhancement allows for a more nuanced understanding of sentiment. By considering neutral reviews, we gain deeper insights into the sentiment landscape. Dual Sentiment Analysis plays a pivotal role in helping companies gauge the level of acceptance of their products and formulate strategies to improve product quality. Moreover, it empowers policymakers and politicians to gain valuable insights by analyzing public sentiments on policies, public services, and political issues.}
}RIS (EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley)
TY - JOUR TI - Identifying Product Aspect Polarity by Product Review Classification with Dual Sentiment Analysis AU - Lohia, Dr. Harsh JO - Journal of Science & Technology PY - 2024 DA - 2024/01/25/ VL - 9 IS - 1 SP - 139 EP - 147 PB - Longman Publishers SN - 2456-5660 LA - en AB - Dual Sentiment Analysis has emerged as a crucial and active research field. It involves extracting sentiment from comments, feedback, or critiques, which serves as valuable indicators for various purposes. To address this, we propose a novel dual training algorithm that utilizes both original and reversed training reviews to develop a robust sentiment classifier. Additionally, we introduce a dual prediction algorithm that comprehensively assesses both aspects of a review for classification during testing. The proposed approach goes beyond traditional polarity (positive-negative) classification by extending the framework to a 3-class system, which includes neutral reviews. This enhancement allows for a more nuanced understanding of sentiment. By considering neutral reviews, we gain deeper insights into the sentiment landscape. Dual Sentiment Analysis plays a pivotal role in helping companies gauge the level of acceptance of their products and formulate strategies to improve product quality. Moreover, it empowers policymakers and politicians to gain valuable insights by analyzing public sentiments on policies, public services, and political issues. DO - 10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147 UR - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147 ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"type": "article-journal",
"id": "10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147",
"DOI": "10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147",
"title": "Identifying Product Aspect Polarity by Product Review Classification with Dual Sentiment Analysis",
"source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
"container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Lohia",
"given": "Dr. Harsh"
}
],
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2024,
1,
25
]
]
},
"volume": "9",
"issue": "1",
"page": "139-147",
"publisher": "Longman Publishers",
"language": "en",
"abstract": "Dual Sentiment Analysis has emerged as a crucial and active research field. It involves extracting sentiment from comments, feedback, or critiques, which serves as valuable indicators for various purposes. To address this, we propose a novel dual training algorithm that utilizes both original and reversed training reviews to develop a robust sentiment classifier. Additionally, we introduce a dual prediction algorithm that comprehensively assesses both aspects of a review for classification during testing. The proposed approach goes beyond traditional polarity (positive-negative) classification by extending the framework to a 3-class system, which includes neutral reviews. This enhancement allows for a more nuanced understanding of sentiment. By considering neutral reviews, we gain deeper insights into the sentiment landscape. Dual Sentiment Analysis plays a pivotal role in helping companies gauge the level of acceptance of their products and formulate strategies to improve product quality. Moreover, it empowers policymakers and politicians to gain valuable insights by analyzing public sentiments on policies, public services, and political issues.",
"ISSN": "2456-5660"
} ⬇ .json What citeproc and reference managers read; the DOI system hands it out for Accept: application/vnd.citationstyles.csl+json, and so does this registry's resolver.
From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2024.v9.i01.pp139-147 gives all four in one JSON answer.
