Smart Scholars🛡 Scholar Shield🏛 Research Integrity Desk🧩 Portfolio Console📰 Journals🔧 DOI MembersTools🔎 Journal AuditGI GetIndexedDr DOI Doctor

Cite this DOI

10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i09.pp65-82 · A benchmark study of machine learning models for online fake news detection

APA (7th edition)

Dr.R VVSV PRASAD, D. V. P. (2022). A benchmark study of machine learning models for online fake news detection. *Journal of Science & Technology*, *7*(9), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i09.pp65-82

⬇ text Italics are shown as *asterisks* in plain text — the journal or book title and the volume.

BibTeX

@article{drrvvsvprasad2022benchmark,
  author    = {Dr.R VVSV PRASAD, Dr.R VVSV PRASAD},
  title     = {{A benchmark study of machine learning models for online fake news detection}},
  journal   = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
  year      = {2022},
  month     = {may},
  volume    = {7},
  number    = {9},
  pages     = {65--82},
  publisher = {Longman Publishers},
  issn      = {2456-5660},
  doi       = {10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i09.pp65-82},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i09.pp65-82},
  language  = {en},
  abstract  = {The widespread circulation of false information via online platforms is a growing cause for alarm because of the havoc it may wreak. Several machine learning strategies have been proposed for spotting hoaxes. However, the vast majority of them concentrated on a certain category of news (like politics), raising the issue of dataset bias in the used models. Here, we provide the results of a benchmark study that compares three datasets to determine which machine learning technique performs best. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to investigate and evaluate the performance of many state-of-the- art pre-trained language models for false news detection, alongside the performance of classical and deep learning models. When it comes to detecting false news, we discover that BERT and other comparable pre-trained models perform the best, even when working with a tiny dataset. Because of this, these models are a much superior choice for languages with few electronic contents (i.e., training data). Additionally, we analyzed the models' efficacy, article topics, and article lengths, and shared our findings and insights. We hope that our benchmark study will encourage additional investigation in the field of false news identification and enable news sites and blogs choose the most effective approach.}
}

⬇ .bib

RIS (EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley)

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A benchmark study of machine learning models for online fake news detection
AU  - Dr.R VVSV PRASAD, Dr.R VVSV PRASAD
JO  - Journal of Science & Technology
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/05/11/
VL  - 7
IS  - 9
SP  - 65
EP  - 82
PB  - Longman Publishers
SN  - 2456-5660
LA  - en
AB  - The widespread circulation of false information via online platforms is a growing cause for alarm because of the havoc it may wreak. Several machine learning strategies have been proposed for spotting hoaxes. However, the vast majority of them concentrated on a certain category of news (like politics), raising the issue of dataset bias in the used models. Here, we provide the results of a benchmark study that compares three datasets to determine which machine learning technique performs best. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to investigate and evaluate the performance of many state-of-the- art pre-trained language models for false news detection, alongside the performance of classical and deep learning models. When it comes to detecting false news, we discover that BERT and other comparable pre-trained models perform the best, even when working with a tiny dataset. Because of this, these models are a much superior choice for languages with few electronic contents (i.e., training data). Additionally, we analyzed the models' efficacy, article topics, and article lengths, and shared our findings and insights. We hope that our benchmark study will encourage additional investigation in the field of false news identification and enable news sites and blogs choose the most effective approach.
DO  - 10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i09.pp65-82
UR  - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i09.pp65-82
ER  -

⬇ .ris

CSL-JSON

{
    "type": "article-journal",
    "id": "10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i09.pp65-82",
    "DOI": "10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i09.pp65-82",
    "URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i09.pp65-82",
    "title": "A benchmark study of machine learning models for online fake news detection",
    "source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
    "container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
    "author": [
        {
            "family": "Dr.R VVSV PRASAD",
            "given": "Dr.R VVSV PRASAD"
        }
    ],
    "issued": {
        "date-parts": [
            [
                2022,
                5,
                11
            ]
        ]
    },
    "volume": "7",
    "issue": "9",
    "page": "65-82",
    "publisher": "Longman Publishers",
    "language": "en",
    "abstract": "The widespread circulation of false information via online platforms is a growing cause for alarm because of the havoc it may wreak. Several machine learning strategies have been proposed for spotting hoaxes. However, the vast majority of them concentrated on a certain category of news (like politics), raising the issue of dataset bias in the used models. Here, we provide the results of a benchmark study that compares three datasets to determine which machine learning technique performs best. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to investigate and evaluate the performance of many state-of-the- art pre-trained language models for false news detection, alongside the performance of classical and deep learning models. When it comes to detecting false news, we discover that BERT and other comparable pre-trained models perform the best, even when working with a tiny dataset. Because of this, these models are a much superior choice for languages with few electronic contents (i.e., training data). Additionally, we analyzed the models' efficacy, article topics, and article lengths, and shared our findings and insights. We hope that our benchmark study will encourage additional investigation in the field of false news identification and enable news sites and blogs choose the most effective approach.",
    "ISSN": "2456-5660"
}

⬇ .json What citeproc and reference managers read; the DOI system hands it out for Accept: application/vnd.citationstyles.csl+json, and so does this registry's resolver.

From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2022.v7.i09.pp65-82 gives all four in one JSON answer.

Everything Smart Scholars runsNine sites, one account. A journal starts at the audit; an author starts at Scholar Shield.

For journals & publishers

Start with the audit — it is free, and it is the gate to everything else.

DOI care

Nine services on one journal profile — each previews first and acts only on your approval.

For authors & researchers

Free to use. Nothing you check is shared with the journal.

For institutions, sponsors & DOI operators

Smart Scholars

Mon–Sat, 10:00–19:00 IST. The Ask AI button on every page answers about our services at any hour.

News

Policies

What we can register a DOI for

20 kinds of record, one account, one place. Every one gets a DOI that resolves, metadata that indexes read, and a record that stays correct afterwards.
Journals
  • Journal articles
  • Journal titles
  • Pending publications
  • Peer reviews
  • Preprints & posted content
Books & conferences
  • Books
  • Book chapters
  • Book series
  • Book sets
  • Conference proceedings
  • Proceedings series
  • Conference papers
Other research output
  • Theses & dissertations
  • Reports & working papers
  • Report series
  • Standards
  • Databases
  • Datasets
  • Figures, tables & supplements
Funding
  • Grants & funding awards

Elsewhere

The same company, in the places our publishers already read.
Smart Scholars · Every service on one pageData from OpenAlex (openalex.org), CC0 · Crossref · ISSN Portal · DOAJContact
WhatsApp