Smart Scholars🛡 Scholar Shield🏛 Research Integrity Desk🧩 Portfolio Console📰 Journals🔧 DOI MembersTools🔎 Journal AuditGI GetIndexedDr DOI Doctor

Cite this DOI

10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i04.pp45-59 · Flipped Classroom Approached in Learning Taxonomy and Classification: AssessingLearning Performance of Grade 11 Students of Notre Dame of Midsayap College

APA (7th edition)

Angel Lhi D. Alcalde, A. L. D. A. (2022). Flipped Classroom Approached in Learning Taxonomy and Classification: AssessingLearning Performance of Grade 11 Students of Notre Dame of Midsayap College. *Journal of Science & Technology*, *7*(4), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i04.pp45-59

⬇ text Italics are shown as *asterisks* in plain text — the journal or book title and the volume.

BibTeX

@article{angellhidalcalde2022flipped,
  author    = {Angel Lhi D. Alcalde, Angel Lhi D. Alcalde},
  title     = {{Flipped Classroom Approached in Learning Taxonomy and Classification: AssessingLearning Performance of Grade 11 Students of Notre Dame of Midsayap College}},
  journal   = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
  year      = {2022},
  month     = {jun},
  volume    = {7},
  number    = {4},
  pages     = {45--59},
  publisher = {Longman Publishers},
  issn      = {2456-5660},
  doi       = {10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i04.pp45-59},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i04.pp45-59},
  language  = {en},
  abstract  = {Before employing the flipped classroom approach, pupils' pre-test results were much lowerthan they were after using it. The preferences of both the male and female control and experimental groups were influenced by the flipped classroom and lecture content, respectively. When it came to assessing evolutionary relationships, there were substantial differences between the experimental and control groups. Phylogeny evaluation was performed on the post-test, and the females in the experimental group fared much better than the females in the control group. In terms of systematic differences, there was a statistically significant difference in post-test findings between the experimental and control groups for both males and females. On the other hand, the overall evaluation of Females in the experimental group outperformed males in the post-test. When the post-test data were compared between males and females, it was discovered that there was a significant variation in phylogeny between the experimental and control groups. On the post-test, males in the experimental group outperformed women in the control group, indicating that the study was successful. The responses to the Motivation to Learn Survey Questionnaire from both the experimental and control groups were compared. The control group had a higher mean score in motivation than the experimental group, but the extrinsic goal-oriented group had a mean score that was close to that of the control and experimental groups, as shown in Table 1. The intrinsicgoal orientation, control of learning beliefs, and self-efficacy of the control group were all shown to be significantly different from the experimental group. The relationship between intrinsic goal orientation and task value was not statistically significant.}
}

⬇ .bib

RIS (EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley)

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Flipped Classroom Approached in Learning Taxonomy and Classification: AssessingLearning Performance of Grade 11 Students of Notre Dame of Midsayap College
AU  - Angel Lhi D. Alcalde, Angel Lhi D. Alcalde
JO  - Journal of Science & Technology
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/06/27/
VL  - 7
IS  - 4
SP  - 45
EP  - 59
PB  - Longman Publishers
SN  - 2456-5660
LA  - en
AB  - Before employing the flipped classroom approach, pupils' pre-test results were much lowerthan they were after using it. The preferences of both the male and female control and experimental groups were influenced by the flipped classroom and lecture content, respectively. When it came to assessing evolutionary relationships, there were substantial differences between the experimental and control groups. Phylogeny evaluation was performed on the post-test, and the females in the experimental group fared much better than the females in the control group. In terms of systematic differences, there was a statistically significant difference in post-test findings between the experimental and control groups for both males and females. On the other hand, the overall evaluation of Females in the experimental group outperformed males in the post-test. When the post-test data were compared between males and females, it was discovered that there was a significant variation in phylogeny between the experimental and control groups. On the post-test, males in the experimental group outperformed women in the control group, indicating that the study was successful. The responses to the Motivation to Learn Survey Questionnaire from both the experimental and control groups were compared. The control group had a higher mean score in motivation than the experimental group, but the extrinsic goal-oriented group had a mean score that was close to that of the control and experimental groups, as shown in Table 1. The intrinsicgoal orientation, control of learning beliefs, and self-efficacy of the control group were all shown to be significantly different from the experimental group. The relationship between intrinsic goal orientation and task value was not statistically significant.
DO  - 10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i04.pp45-59
UR  - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i04.pp45-59
ER  -

⬇ .ris

CSL-JSON

{
    "type": "article-journal",
    "id": "10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i04.pp45-59",
    "DOI": "10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i04.pp45-59",
    "URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i04.pp45-59",
    "title": "Flipped Classroom Approached in Learning Taxonomy and Classification: AssessingLearning Performance of Grade 11 Students of Notre Dame of Midsayap College",
    "source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
    "container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
    "author": [
        {
            "family": "Angel Lhi D. Alcalde",
            "given": "Angel Lhi D. Alcalde"
        }
    ],
    "issued": {
        "date-parts": [
            [
                2022,
                6,
                27
            ]
        ]
    },
    "volume": "7",
    "issue": "4",
    "page": "45-59",
    "publisher": "Longman Publishers",
    "language": "en",
    "abstract": "Before employing the flipped classroom approach, pupils' pre-test results were much lowerthan they were after using it. The preferences of both the male and female control and experimental groups were influenced by the flipped classroom and lecture content, respectively. When it came to assessing evolutionary relationships, there were substantial differences between the experimental and control groups. Phylogeny evaluation was performed on the post-test, and the females in the experimental group fared much better than the females in the control group. In terms of systematic differences, there was a statistically significant difference in post-test findings between the experimental and control groups for both males and females. On the other hand, the overall evaluation of Females in the experimental group outperformed males in the post-test. When the post-test data were compared between males and females, it was discovered that there was a significant variation in phylogeny between the experimental and control groups. On the post-test, males in the experimental group outperformed women in the control group, indicating that the study was successful. The responses to the Motivation to Learn Survey Questionnaire from both the experimental and control groups were compared. The control group had a higher mean score in motivation than the experimental group, but the extrinsic goal-oriented group had a mean score that was close to that of the control and experimental groups, as shown in Table 1. The intrinsicgoal orientation, control of learning beliefs, and self-efficacy of the control group were all shown to be significantly different from the experimental group. The relationship between intrinsic goal orientation and task value was not statistically significant.",
    "ISSN": "2456-5660"
}

⬇ .json What citeproc and reference managers read; the DOI system hands it out for Accept: application/vnd.citationstyles.csl+json, and so does this registry's resolver.

From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2022.v7.i04.pp45-59 gives all four in one JSON answer.

Everything Smart Scholars runsNine sites, one account. A journal starts at the audit; an author starts at Scholar Shield.

For journals & publishers

Start with the audit — it is free, and it is the gate to everything else.

DOI care

Nine services on one journal profile — each previews first and acts only on your approval.

For authors & researchers

Free to use. Nothing you check is shared with the journal.

For institutions, sponsors & DOI operators

Smart Scholars

Mon–Sat, 10:00–19:00 IST. The Ask AI button on every page answers about our services at any hour.

News

Policies

What we can register a DOI for

20 kinds of record, one account, one place. Every one gets a DOI that resolves, metadata that indexes read, and a record that stays correct afterwards.
Journals
  • Journal articles
  • Journal titles
  • Pending publications
  • Peer reviews
  • Preprints & posted content
Books & conferences
  • Books
  • Book chapters
  • Book series
  • Book sets
  • Conference proceedings
  • Proceedings series
  • Conference papers
Other research output
  • Theses & dissertations
  • Reports & working papers
  • Report series
  • Standards
  • Databases
  • Datasets
  • Figures, tables & supplements
Funding
  • Grants & funding awards

Elsewhere

The same company, in the places our publishers already read.
Smart Scholars · Every service on one pageData from OpenAlex (openalex.org), CC0 · Crossref · ISSN Portal · DOAJContact
WhatsApp