Smart Scholars🛡 Scholar Shield🏛 Research Integrity Desk🧩 Portfolio Console📰 Journals🔧 DOI MembersTools🔎 Journal AuditGI GetIndexedDr DOI Doctor

Cite this DOI

10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp395-422 · A Survey of Controlled Experiments in Software Engineering

APA (7th edition)

Dr.M.V Siva Prasad, D. S. P. (2022). A Survey of Controlled Experiments in Software Engineering. *Journal of Science & Technology*, *7*(2), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp395-422

⬇ text Italics are shown as *asterisks* in plain text — the journal or book title and the volume.

BibTeX

@article{drmvsivaprasad2022survey,
  author    = {Dr.M.V Siva Prasad, Dr.M.V Siva Prasad},
  title     = {{A Survey of Controlled Experiments in Software Engineering}},
  journal   = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
  year      = {2022},
  month     = {jul},
  volume    = {7},
  number    = {2},
  pages     = {395--422},
  publisher = {Longman Publishers},
  issn      = {2456-5660},
  doi       = {10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp395-422},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp395-422},
  language  = {en},
  abstract  = {The classical method for identifying cause-effect relationships is to conduct controlled experiments. This paper reports upon the present state of how controlled experiments in software engineering are conducted and the extent to which relevant information is reported. Among the 5,453 scientific articles published in 12 leading software engineering journals and conferences inthe decade from 1993 to 2002, 103 articles (1.9 percent) reported controlled experiments in which individuals or teams performed one or more software engineering tasks. This survey quantitatively characterizes the topics of the experiments and their subjects (number of subjects, students versus professionals, recruitment, and rewards for participation), tasks (type of task, duration, and type and size of application) and environments (location, development tools). Furthermore, the survey reports on how internal and external validity is addressed and the extent to which experiments are replicated. The gathered data reflects the relevance of software engineering experiments to industrial practice and the scientific maturity of software engineering research}
}

⬇ .bib

RIS (EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley)

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A Survey of Controlled Experiments in Software Engineering
AU  - Dr.M.V Siva Prasad, Dr.M.V Siva Prasad
JO  - Journal of Science & Technology
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/07/03/
VL  - 7
IS  - 2
SP  - 395
EP  - 422
PB  - Longman Publishers
SN  - 2456-5660
LA  - en
AB  - The classical method for identifying cause-effect relationships is to conduct controlled experiments. This paper reports upon the present state of how controlled experiments in software engineering are conducted and the extent to which relevant information is reported. Among the 5,453 scientific articles published in 12 leading software engineering journals and conferences inthe decade from 1993 to 2002, 103 articles (1.9 percent) reported controlled experiments in which individuals or teams performed one or more software engineering tasks. This survey quantitatively characterizes the topics of the experiments and their subjects (number of subjects, students versus professionals, recruitment, and rewards for participation), tasks (type of task, duration, and type and size of application) and environments (location, development tools). Furthermore, the survey reports on how internal and external validity is addressed and the extent to which experiments are replicated. The gathered data reflects the relevance of software engineering experiments to industrial practice and the scientific maturity of software engineering research
DO  - 10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp395-422
UR  - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp395-422
ER  -

⬇ .ris

CSL-JSON

{
    "type": "article-journal",
    "id": "10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp395-422",
    "DOI": "10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp395-422",
    "URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp395-422",
    "title": "A Survey of Controlled Experiments in Software Engineering",
    "source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
    "container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
    "author": [
        {
            "family": "Dr.M.V Siva Prasad",
            "given": "Dr.M.V Siva Prasad"
        }
    ],
    "issued": {
        "date-parts": [
            [
                2022,
                7,
                3
            ]
        ]
    },
    "volume": "7",
    "issue": "2",
    "page": "395-422",
    "publisher": "Longman Publishers",
    "language": "en",
    "abstract": "The classical method for identifying cause-effect relationships is to conduct controlled experiments. This paper reports upon the present state of how controlled experiments in software engineering are conducted and the extent to which relevant information is reported. Among the 5,453 scientific articles published in 12 leading software engineering journals and conferences inthe decade from 1993 to 2002, 103 articles (1.9 percent) reported controlled experiments in which individuals or teams performed one or more software engineering tasks. This survey quantitatively characterizes the topics of the experiments and their subjects (number of subjects, students versus professionals, recruitment, and rewards for participation), tasks (type of task, duration, and type and size of application) and environments (location, development tools). Furthermore, the survey reports on how internal and external validity is addressed and the extent to which experiments are replicated. The gathered data reflects the relevance of software engineering experiments to industrial practice and the scientific maturity of software engineering research",
    "ISSN": "2456-5660"
}

⬇ .json What citeproc and reference managers read; the DOI system hands it out for Accept: application/vnd.citationstyles.csl+json, and so does this registry's resolver.

From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2022.v7.i02.pp395-422 gives all four in one JSON answer.

Everything Smart Scholars runsNine sites, one account. A journal starts at the audit; an author starts at Scholar Shield.

For journals & publishers

Start with the audit — it is free, and it is the gate to everything else.

DOI care

Nine services on one journal profile — each previews first and acts only on your approval.

For authors & researchers

Free to use. Nothing you check is shared with the journal.

For institutions, sponsors & DOI operators

Smart Scholars

Mon–Sat, 10:00–19:00 IST. The Ask AI button on every page answers about our services at any hour.

News

Policies

What we can register a DOI for

20 kinds of record, one account, one place. Every one gets a DOI that resolves, metadata that indexes read, and a record that stays correct afterwards.
Journals
  • Journal articles
  • Journal titles
  • Pending publications
  • Peer reviews
  • Preprints & posted content
Books & conferences
  • Books
  • Book chapters
  • Book series
  • Book sets
  • Conference proceedings
  • Proceedings series
  • Conference papers
Other research output
  • Theses & dissertations
  • Reports & working papers
  • Report series
  • Standards
  • Databases
  • Datasets
  • Figures, tables & supplements
Funding
  • Grants & funding awards

Elsewhere

The same company, in the places our publishers already read.
Smart Scholars · Every service on one pageData from OpenAlex (openalex.org), CC0 · Crossref · ISSN Portal · DOAJContact
WhatsApp