Smart Scholars🛡 Scholar Shield🏛 Research Integrity Desk🧩 Portfolio Console📰 Journals🔧 DOI MembersTools🔎 Journal AuditGI GetIndexedDr DOI Doctor

Cite this DOI

10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp254-269 · Socio-demographical variables effects on perceived parenting styles among Adolescents—a demographical study in Andhra Pradesh

APA (7th edition)

Subhashini Akurathi, S. A. (2022). Socio-demographical variables effects on perceived parenting styles among Adolescents—a demographical study in Andhra Pradesh. *Journal of Science & Technology*, *7*(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp254-269

⬇ text Italics are shown as *asterisks* in plain text — the journal or book title and the volume.

BibTeX

@article{subhashiniakurathi2022sociodemographical,
  author    = {Subhashini Akurathi, Subhashini Akurathi},
  title     = {{Socio-demographical variables effects on perceived parenting styles among Adolescents—a demographical study in Andhra Pradesh}},
  journal   = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
  year      = {2022},
  month     = {jul},
  volume    = {7},
  number    = {2},
  pages     = {254--269},
  publisher = {Longman Publishers},
  issn      = {2456-5660},
  doi       = {10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp254-269},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp254-269},
  language  = {en},
  abstract  = {The objective of the present study is to find the effects of socio-demographic context on perceived parenting styles among Adolescents—a demographical study in Andhra Pradesh. The current study participant's sample number was 1208 adolescents of both genders within the age range of 12 to 18 years, studying in 8th and 9th standard, SSC, and Intermediate of English and Telugu medium schools those who belong to Rural and urban living population with joint and nuclear family system in Andhra Pradesh. Background of the study: The rural population is more homogenous in social, racial, and psychological traits that negatively correlate with heterogeneity. (Most agriculturists are directly connected with agriculture). More heterogeneous than rural. Urbanity and heterogeneity are positively co-related (Different population types are seen in cities, places, religions, caste, class, race, community, economic and cultural differences, occupations, and behavioral patterns are also different). Family structure is in the form of two types. Nuclear and joint families differ in the support each inherently offers, affecting adolescents' behavior. Method: In the present study, the proportionate stratified random sampling method has been followed to collect the data from the sample. A demographic survey gathered family structure information and the number of disciplinary incidents from rural and urban living places for middle adolescents in Andhra Pradesh. They also completed a parenting style tool that measured adolescents' perceived parenting modes—R.L.Bharadwaj eight modes of parenting styles. There was applied SPSS-21 to analyse the adolescents' perceived parenting styles on study variables. The analysis was used based on objectives framed for the particular hypotheses. t-test and way ANOVA was administered to test the hypotheses. The results indicated a significant difference between rejection vs. acceptance neglect vs. indulgence parenting styles among middle adolescents. The other results found that socioeconomic status showed substantial differences in Middle adolescents' perceived parenting styles on rejection vs. Acceptance, carelessness vs. Protection, and lenient standards vs. moralism parenting styles. The study found that adolescents from urban and rural semi-urban showed a significant difference in lenient standards and moralism practices. Analysis revealed that adolescents living with joint and nuclear families using a neglecting parenting style were less likely to receive disciplinary incidents compared to adolescents living with joint family structure. Previous research suggested that an authoritative parenting style tends to benefit adolescents regardless of the family structure. Implications Present study results summarize that areas of residence (Rural, Urban, and Semi-urban) showed significant differences in Andhra Pradesh middle adolescents' perceived parenting styles. The study implies that nuclear family middle adolescents perceiving parenting style significantly differed on neglecting a parent than joint family respondents perceiving parenting style.}
}

⬇ .bib

RIS (EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley)

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Socio-demographical variables effects on perceived parenting styles among Adolescents—a demographical study in Andhra Pradesh
AU  - Subhashini Akurathi, Subhashini Akurathi
JO  - Journal of Science & Technology
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/07/03/
VL  - 7
IS  - 2
SP  - 254
EP  - 269
PB  - Longman Publishers
SN  - 2456-5660
LA  - en
AB  - The objective of the present study is to find the effects of socio-demographic context on perceived parenting styles among Adolescents—a demographical study in Andhra Pradesh. The current study participant's sample number was 1208 adolescents of both genders within the age range of 12 to 18 years, studying in 8th and 9th standard, SSC, and Intermediate of English and Telugu medium schools those who belong to Rural and urban living population with joint and nuclear family system in Andhra Pradesh. Background of the study: The rural population is more homogenous in social, racial, and psychological traits that negatively correlate with heterogeneity. (Most agriculturists are directly connected with agriculture). More heterogeneous than rural. Urbanity and heterogeneity are positively co-related (Different population types are seen in cities, places, religions, caste, class, race, community, economic and cultural differences, occupations, and behavioral patterns are also different). Family structure is in the form of two types. Nuclear and joint families differ in the support each inherently offers, affecting adolescents' behavior. Method: In the present study, the proportionate stratified random sampling method has been followed to collect the data from the sample. A demographic survey gathered family structure information and the number of disciplinary incidents from rural and urban living places for middle adolescents in Andhra Pradesh. They also completed a parenting style tool that measured adolescents' perceived parenting modes—R.L.Bharadwaj eight modes of parenting styles. There was applied SPSS-21 to analyse the adolescents' perceived parenting styles on study variables. The analysis was used based on objectives framed for the particular hypotheses. t-test and way ANOVA was administered to test the hypotheses. The results indicated a significant difference between rejection vs. acceptance neglect vs. indulgence parenting styles among middle adolescents. The other results found that socioeconomic status showed substantial differences in Middle adolescents' perceived parenting styles on rejection vs. Acceptance, carelessness vs. Protection, and lenient standards vs. moralism parenting styles. The study found that adolescents from urban and rural semi-urban showed a significant difference in lenient standards and moralism practices. Analysis revealed that adolescents living with joint and nuclear families using a neglecting parenting style were less likely to receive disciplinary incidents compared to adolescents living with joint family structure. Previous research suggested that an authoritative parenting style tends to benefit adolescents regardless of the family structure. Implications Present study results summarize that areas of residence (Rural, Urban, and Semi-urban) showed significant differences in Andhra Pradesh middle adolescents' perceived parenting styles. The study implies that nuclear family middle adolescents perceiving parenting style significantly differed on neglecting a parent than joint family respondents perceiving parenting style.
DO  - 10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp254-269
UR  - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp254-269
ER  -

⬇ .ris

CSL-JSON

{
    "type": "article-journal",
    "id": "10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp254-269",
    "DOI": "10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp254-269",
    "URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2022.v7.i02.pp254-269",
    "title": "Socio-demographical variables effects on perceived parenting styles among Adolescents—a demographical study in Andhra Pradesh",
    "source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
    "container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
    "author": [
        {
            "family": "Subhashini Akurathi",
            "given": "Subhashini Akurathi"
        }
    ],
    "issued": {
        "date-parts": [
            [
                2022,
                7,
                3
            ]
        ]
    },
    "volume": "7",
    "issue": "2",
    "page": "254-269",
    "publisher": "Longman Publishers",
    "language": "en",
    "abstract": "The objective of the present study is to find the effects of socio-demographic context on perceived parenting styles among Adolescents—a demographical study in Andhra Pradesh. The current study participant's sample number was 1208 adolescents of both genders within the age range of 12 to 18 years, studying in 8th and 9th standard, SSC, and Intermediate of English and Telugu medium schools those who belong to Rural and urban living population with joint and nuclear family system in Andhra Pradesh. Background of the study: The rural population is more homogenous in social, racial, and psychological traits that negatively correlate with heterogeneity. (Most agriculturists are directly connected with agriculture). More heterogeneous than rural. Urbanity and heterogeneity are positively co-related (Different population types are seen in cities, places, religions, caste, class, race, community, economic and cultural differences, occupations, and behavioral patterns are also different). Family structure is in the form of two types. Nuclear and joint families differ in the support each inherently offers, affecting adolescents' behavior. Method: In the present study, the proportionate stratified random sampling method has been followed to collect the data from the sample. A demographic survey gathered family structure information and the number of disciplinary incidents from rural and urban living places for middle adolescents in Andhra Pradesh. They also completed a parenting style tool that measured adolescents' perceived parenting modes—R.L.Bharadwaj eight modes of parenting styles. There was applied SPSS-21 to analyse the adolescents' perceived parenting styles on study variables. The analysis was used based on objectives framed for the particular hypotheses. t-test and way ANOVA was administered to test the hypotheses. The results indicated a significant difference between rejection vs. acceptance neglect vs. indulgence parenting styles among middle adolescents. The other results found that socioeconomic status showed substantial differences in Middle adolescents' perceived parenting styles on rejection vs. Acceptance, carelessness vs. Protection, and lenient standards vs. moralism parenting styles. The study found that adolescents from urban and rural semi-urban showed a significant difference in lenient standards and moralism practices. Analysis revealed that adolescents living with joint and nuclear families using a neglecting parenting style were less likely to receive disciplinary incidents compared to adolescents living with joint family structure. Previous research suggested that an authoritative parenting style tends to benefit adolescents regardless of the family structure. Implications Present study results summarize that areas of residence (Rural, Urban, and Semi-urban) showed significant differences in Andhra Pradesh middle adolescents' perceived parenting styles. The study implies that nuclear family middle adolescents perceiving parenting style significantly differed on neglecting a parent than joint family respondents perceiving parenting style.",
    "ISSN": "2456-5660"
}

⬇ .json What citeproc and reference managers read; the DOI system hands it out for Accept: application/vnd.citationstyles.csl+json, and so does this registry's resolver.

From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2022.v7.i02.pp254-269 gives all four in one JSON answer.

Everything Smart Scholars runsNine sites, one account. A journal starts at the audit; an author starts at Scholar Shield.

For journals & publishers

Start with the audit — it is free, and it is the gate to everything else.

DOI care

Nine services on one journal profile — each previews first and acts only on your approval.

For authors & researchers

Free to use. Nothing you check is shared with the journal.

For institutions, sponsors & DOI operators

Smart Scholars

Mon–Sat, 10:00–19:00 IST. The Ask AI button on every page answers about our services at any hour.

News

Policies

What we can register a DOI for

20 kinds of record, one account, one place. Every one gets a DOI that resolves, metadata that indexes read, and a record that stays correct afterwards.
Journals
  • Journal articles
  • Journal titles
  • Pending publications
  • Peer reviews
  • Preprints & posted content
Books & conferences
  • Books
  • Book chapters
  • Book series
  • Book sets
  • Conference proceedings
  • Proceedings series
  • Conference papers
Other research output
  • Theses & dissertations
  • Reports & working papers
  • Report series
  • Standards
  • Databases
  • Datasets
  • Figures, tables & supplements
Funding
  • Grants & funding awards

Elsewhere

The same company, in the places our publishers already read.
Smart Scholars · Every service on one pageData from OpenAlex (openalex.org), CC0 · Crossref · ISSN Portal · DOAJContact
WhatsApp