Cite this DOI
10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp168-179 · Tools used in Global Software Engineering: A systematic mapping review
APA (7th edition)
Naik, D. R., S. Leelashyam, & M Venkataratnam (2021). Tools used in Global Software Engineering: A systematic mapping review. *Journal of Science & Technology*, *06*(05), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp168-179
⬇ text Italics are shown as *asterisks* in plain text — the journal or book title and the volume.
BibTeX
@article{naik2021tools,
author = {Naik, D Rajeev and S. Leelashyam and M Venkataratnam},
title = {{Tools used in Global Software Engineering: A systematic mapping review}},
journal = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
year = {2021},
month = {oct},
volume = {06},
number = {05},
pages = {168--179},
publisher = {Longman Publishers},
issn = {2456-5660},
doi = {10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp168-179},
url = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp168-179},
language = {en},
abstract = {Method: We performed a systematic mapping review through a search for studies that answered our research question, ‘‘Which software tools (commercial, free or research based) are available to support Global Software Engineering?’’ Applying a range of related search terms to key electronic databases, selected journals, and conferences and workshops enabled us to extract relevant papers. We then used a data extraction template to classify, extract and record important information about the GSD tools from each paper. This information was synthesized and presented as a general map of types of GSD tools, the tool’s main features and how each tool was validated in practice. Results: The main result is a list of 132 tools, which, according to the literature, have been, or are intended to be, used in global software projects. The classification of these tools includes lists of features for com- munication, coordination and control as well as how the tool has been validated in practice. We found that out the total of 132, the majority of tools were developed at research centers, and only a small per- centage of tools (18.9\%) are reported as having been tested outside the initial context in which they were developed.}
}RIS (EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley)
TY - JOUR TI - Tools used in Global Software Engineering: A systematic mapping review AU - Naik, D Rajeev AU - S. Leelashyam AU - M Venkataratnam JO - Journal of Science & Technology PY - 2021 DA - 2021/10/28/ VL - 06 IS - 05 SP - 168 EP - 179 PB - Longman Publishers SN - 2456-5660 LA - en AB - Method: We performed a systematic mapping review through a search for studies that answered our research question, ‘‘Which software tools (commercial, free or research based) are available to support Global Software Engineering?’’ Applying a range of related search terms to key electronic databases, selected journals, and conferences and workshops enabled us to extract relevant papers. We then used a data extraction template to classify, extract and record important information about the GSD tools from each paper. This information was synthesized and presented as a general map of types of GSD tools, the tool’s main features and how each tool was validated in practice. Results: The main result is a list of 132 tools, which, according to the literature, have been, or are intended to be, used in global software projects. The classification of these tools includes lists of features for com- munication, coordination and control as well as how the tool has been validated in practice. We found that out the total of 132, the majority of tools were developed at research centers, and only a small per- centage of tools (18.9%) are reported as having been tested outside the initial context in which they were developed. DO - 10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp168-179 UR - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp168-179 ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"type": "article-journal",
"id": "10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp168-179",
"DOI": "10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp168-179",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp168-179",
"title": "Tools used in Global Software Engineering: A systematic mapping review",
"source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
"container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Naik",
"given": "D Rajeev"
},
{
"family": "S. Leelashyam"
},
{
"family": "M Venkataratnam"
}
],
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2021,
10,
28
]
]
},
"volume": "06",
"issue": "05",
"page": "168-179",
"publisher": "Longman Publishers",
"language": "en",
"abstract": "Method: We performed a systematic mapping review through a search for studies that answered our research question, ‘‘Which software tools (commercial, free or research based) are available to support Global Software Engineering?’’ Applying a range of related search terms to key electronic databases, selected journals, and conferences and workshops enabled us to extract relevant papers. We then used a data extraction template to classify, extract and record important information about the GSD tools from each paper. This information was synthesized and presented as a general map of types of GSD tools, the tool’s main features and how each tool was validated in practice. Results: The main result is a list of 132 tools, which, according to the literature, have been, or are intended to be, used in global software projects. The classification of these tools includes lists of features for com- munication, coordination and control as well as how the tool has been validated in practice. We found that out the total of 132, the majority of tools were developed at research centers, and only a small per- centage of tools (18.9%) are reported as having been tested outside the initial context in which they were developed.",
"ISSN": "2456-5660"
} ⬇ .json What citeproc and reference managers read; the DOI system hands it out for Accept: application/vnd.citationstyles.csl+json, and so does this registry's resolver.
From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2021.v6.i05.pp168-179 gives all four in one JSON answer.
