Cite this DOI

Navi, C. V., Reddy, P., Kartheek, G. L. N. V., & Kartheek, G. L. N. V. (2021). Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. *Journal of Science & Technology*, 138. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp138-146

@article{navi2021systematic,
  author    = {Navi, CH Venkata and Reddy, P.Sandeep and Kartheek, G L N V and Kartheek, G L N V},
  title     = {{Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering}},
  journal   = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
  year      = {2021},
  month     = {oct},
  pages     = {138},
  publisher = {Longman Publishers},
  issn      = {2456-5660},
  doi       = {10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp138-146},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp138-146},
  language  = {en},
  abstract  = {BACKGROUND: A software engineering systematic map is a defined method to build a classification scheme and structure a software engineering field of interest. The analysis of results focuses on frequencies of publications for categories within the scheme. Thereby, the coverage of the research field can be determined. Different facets of the scheme can also be combined to answer more specific research questions. OBJECTIVE: We describe how to conduct a systematic mapping study in software engineering and provide guidelines. We also compare systematic maps and systematic reviews to clarify how to chose between them. This comparison leads to a set of guidelines for systematic maps. METHOD: We have defined a systematic mapping process and applied it to complete a systematic mapping study. Furthermore, we compare systematic maps with systematic reviews by systematically analyzing existing systematic reviews. RESULTS: We describe a process for software engineering systematic mapping studies and compare it to systematic reviews. Based on this, guidelines for conducting systematic maps are defined. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic maps and reviews are different in terms of goals, breadth, validity issues and implications. Thus, they should be used complementarily and require different methods (e.g., for analysis).}
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering
AU  - Navi, CH Venkata
AU  - Reddy, P.Sandeep
AU  - Kartheek, G L N V
AU  - Kartheek, G L N V
JO  - Journal of Science & Technology
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/10/01/
SP  - 138
PB  - Longman Publishers
SN  - 2456-5660
LA  - en
AB  - BACKGROUND: A software engineering systematic map is a defined method to build a classification scheme and structure a software engineering field of interest. The analysis of results focuses on frequencies of publications for categories within the scheme. Thereby, the coverage of the research field can be determined. Different facets of the scheme can also be combined to answer more specific research questions. OBJECTIVE: We describe how to conduct a systematic mapping study in software engineering and provide guidelines. We also compare systematic maps and systematic reviews to clarify how to chose between them. This comparison leads to a set of guidelines for systematic maps. METHOD: We have defined a systematic mapping process and applied it to complete a systematic mapping study. Furthermore, we compare systematic maps with systematic reviews by systematically analyzing existing systematic reviews. RESULTS: We describe a process for software engineering systematic mapping studies and compare it to systematic reviews. Based on this, guidelines for conducting systematic maps are defined. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic maps and reviews are different in terms of goals, breadth, validity issues and implications. Thus, they should be used complementarily and require different methods (e.g., for analysis).
DO  - 10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp138-146
UR  - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp138-146
ER  -

{
    "type": "article-journal",
    "id": "10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp138-146",
    "DOI": "10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp138-146",
    "URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2021.v6.i05.pp138-146",
    "title": "Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering",
    "source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
    "container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
    "author": [
        {
            "family": "Navi",
            "given": "CH Venkata"
        },
        {
            "family": "Reddy",
            "given": "P.Sandeep"
        },
        {
            "family": "Kartheek",
            "given": "G L N V"
        },
        {
            "family": "Kartheek",
            "given": "G L N V"
        }
    ],
    "issued": {
        "date-parts": [
            [
                2021,
                10,
                1
            ]
        ]
    },
    "page": "138",
    "publisher": "Longman Publishers",
    "language": "en",
    "abstract": "BACKGROUND: A software engineering systematic map is a defined method to build a classification scheme and structure a software engineering field of interest. The analysis of results focuses on frequencies of publications for categories within the scheme. Thereby, the coverage of the research field can be determined. Different facets of the scheme can also be combined to answer more specific research questions. OBJECTIVE: We describe how to conduct a systematic mapping study in software engineering and provide guidelines. We also compare systematic maps and systematic reviews to clarify how to chose between them. This comparison leads to a set of guidelines for systematic maps. METHOD: We have defined a systematic mapping process and applied it to complete a systematic mapping study. Furthermore, we compare systematic maps with systematic reviews by systematically analyzing existing systematic reviews. RESULTS: We describe a process for software engineering systematic mapping studies and compare it to systematic reviews. Based on this, guidelines for conducting systematic maps are defined. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic maps and reviews are different in terms of goals, breadth, validity issues and implications. Thus, they should be used complementarily and require different methods (e.g., for analysis).",
    "ISSN": "2456-5660"
}

From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2021.v6.i05.pp138-146 gives all four in one JSON answer.