Cite this DOI
10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268 · AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification: Enhancing Quality Assurance Through AI-Driven Testing
APA (7th edition)
Natarajan, D. R. (2020). AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification: Enhancing Quality Assurance Through AI-Driven Testing. *Journal of Science & Technology*, *05*(05), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268
⬇ text Italics are shown as *asterisks* in plain text — the journal or book title and the volume.
BibTeX
@article{natarajan2020aigenerated,
author = {Natarajan, Durai Rajesh},
title = {{AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification: Enhancing Quality Assurance Through AI-Driven Testing}},
journal = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
year = {2020},
month = {oct},
volume = {05},
number = {05},
pages = {253--268},
publisher = {Longman Publishers},
issn = {2456-5660},
doi = {10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268},
url = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268},
language = {en},
abstract = {Test automation must be intelligent, scalable, and efficient due to the growing complexity of software systems. With the use of machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), and reinforcement learning (RL), this study offers an AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification that maximizes test case creation, defect detection, and execution speed. The suggested framework reduces execution time (110.7 ms) and resource use (310.5 MB) while improving test coverage (94.8\%), defect detection rate (91.2\%), and correctness (96.7\%). The AI-driven method ensures minimal human interaction by automating the production of test cases, self-healing test scripts, and adapting to changing software modifications. The Full Model (Base + ML + NLP + RL) is the most effective method, with 98.2\% test coverage, 99.4\% accuracy, and 95.4 ms execution time, according to performance comparisons of ML-based, NLP-based, RL-based, and combined AI-driven automation. According to the ablation study, hybrid AI models perform better than solo techniques in terms of fault discovery, testing effectiveness, and verification accuracy.}
}RIS (EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley)
TY - JOUR TI - AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification: Enhancing Quality Assurance Through AI-Driven Testing AU - Natarajan, Durai Rajesh JO - Journal of Science & Technology PY - 2020 DA - 2020/10/29/ VL - 05 IS - 05 SP - 253 EP - 268 PB - Longman Publishers SN - 2456-5660 LA - en AB - Test automation must be intelligent, scalable, and efficient due to the growing complexity of software systems. With the use of machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), and reinforcement learning (RL), this study offers an AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification that maximizes test case creation, defect detection, and execution speed. The suggested framework reduces execution time (110.7 ms) and resource use (310.5 MB) while improving test coverage (94.8%), defect detection rate (91.2%), and correctness (96.7%). The AI-driven method ensures minimal human interaction by automating the production of test cases, self-healing test scripts, and adapting to changing software modifications. The Full Model (Base + ML + NLP + RL) is the most effective method, with 98.2% test coverage, 99.4% accuracy, and 95.4 ms execution time, according to performance comparisons of ML-based, NLP-based, RL-based, and combined AI-driven automation. According to the ablation study, hybrid AI models perform better than solo techniques in terms of fault discovery, testing effectiveness, and verification accuracy. DO - 10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268 UR - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268 ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"type": "article-journal",
"id": "10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268",
"DOI": "10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268",
"title": "AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification: Enhancing Quality Assurance Through AI-Driven Testing",
"source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
"container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Natarajan",
"given": "Durai Rajesh"
}
],
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2020,
10,
29
]
]
},
"volume": "05",
"issue": "05",
"page": "253-268",
"publisher": "Longman Publishers",
"language": "en",
"abstract": "Test automation must be intelligent, scalable, and efficient due to the growing complexity of software systems. With the use of machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), and reinforcement learning (RL), this study offers an AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification that maximizes test case creation, defect detection, and execution speed. The suggested framework reduces execution time (110.7 ms) and resource use (310.5 MB) while improving test coverage (94.8%), defect detection rate (91.2%), and correctness (96.7%). The AI-driven method ensures minimal human interaction by automating the production of test cases, self-healing test scripts, and adapting to changing software modifications. The Full Model (Base + ML + NLP + RL) is the most effective method, with 98.2% test coverage, 99.4% accuracy, and 95.4 ms execution time, according to performance comparisons of ML-based, NLP-based, RL-based, and combined AI-driven automation. According to the ablation study, hybrid AI models perform better than solo techniques in terms of fault discovery, testing effectiveness, and verification accuracy.",
"ISSN": "2456-5660"
} ⬇ .json What citeproc and reference managers read; the DOI system hands it out for Accept: application/vnd.citationstyles.csl+json, and so does this registry's resolver.
From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268 gives all four in one JSON answer.
