Smart Scholars🛡 Scholar Shield🏛 Research Integrity Desk🧩 Portfolio Console📰 Journals🔧 DOI MembersTools🔎 Journal AuditGI GetIndexedDr DOI Doctor

Cite this DOI

10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268 · AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification: Enhancing Quality Assurance Through AI-Driven Testing

APA (7th edition)

Natarajan, D. R. (2020). AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification: Enhancing Quality Assurance Through AI-Driven Testing. *Journal of Science & Technology*, *05*(05), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268

⬇ text Italics are shown as *asterisks* in plain text — the journal or book title and the volume.

BibTeX

@article{natarajan2020aigenerated,
  author    = {Natarajan, Durai Rajesh},
  title     = {{AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification: Enhancing Quality Assurance Through AI-Driven Testing}},
  journal   = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
  year      = {2020},
  month     = {oct},
  volume    = {05},
  number    = {05},
  pages     = {253--268},
  publisher = {Longman Publishers},
  issn      = {2456-5660},
  doi       = {10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268},
  language  = {en},
  abstract  = {Test automation must be intelligent, scalable, and efficient due to the growing complexity of software systems. With the use of machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), and reinforcement learning (RL), this study offers an AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification that maximizes test case creation, defect detection, and execution speed. The suggested framework reduces execution time (110.7 ms) and resource use (310.5 MB) while improving test coverage (94.8\%), defect detection rate (91.2\%), and correctness (96.7\%). The AI-driven method ensures minimal human interaction by automating the production of test cases, self-healing test scripts, and adapting to changing software modifications. The Full Model (Base + ML + NLP + RL) is the most effective method, with 98.2\% test coverage, 99.4\% accuracy, and 95.4 ms execution time, according to performance comparisons of ML-based, NLP-based, RL-based, and combined AI-driven automation. According to the ablation study, hybrid AI models perform better than solo techniques in terms of fault discovery, testing effectiveness, and verification accuracy.}
}

⬇ .bib

RIS (EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley)

TY  - JOUR
TI  - AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification: Enhancing Quality Assurance Through AI-Driven Testing
AU  - Natarajan, Durai Rajesh
JO  - Journal of Science & Technology
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/10/29/
VL  - 05
IS  - 05
SP  - 253
EP  - 268
PB  - Longman Publishers
SN  - 2456-5660
LA  - en
AB  - Test automation must be intelligent, scalable, and efficient due to the growing complexity of software systems. With the use of machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), and reinforcement learning (RL), this study offers an AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification that maximizes test case creation, defect detection, and execution speed. The suggested framework reduces execution time (110.7 ms) and resource use (310.5 MB) while improving test coverage (94.8%), defect detection rate (91.2%), and correctness (96.7%). The AI-driven method ensures minimal human interaction by automating the production of test cases, self-healing test scripts, and adapting to changing software modifications. The Full Model (Base + ML + NLP + RL) is the most effective method, with 98.2% test coverage, 99.4% accuracy, and 95.4 ms execution time, according to performance comparisons of ML-based, NLP-based, RL-based, and combined AI-driven automation. According to the ablation study, hybrid AI models perform better than solo techniques in terms of fault discovery, testing effectiveness, and verification accuracy.
DO  - 10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268
UR  - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268
ER  -

⬇ .ris

CSL-JSON

{
    "type": "article-journal",
    "id": "10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268",
    "DOI": "10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268",
    "URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268",
    "title": "AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification: Enhancing Quality Assurance Through AI-Driven Testing",
    "source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
    "container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
    "author": [
        {
            "family": "Natarajan",
            "given": "Durai Rajesh"
        }
    ],
    "issued": {
        "date-parts": [
            [
                2020,
                10,
                29
            ]
        ]
    },
    "volume": "05",
    "issue": "05",
    "page": "253-268",
    "publisher": "Longman Publishers",
    "language": "en",
    "abstract": "Test automation must be intelligent, scalable, and efficient due to the growing complexity of software systems. With the use of machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), and reinforcement learning (RL), this study offers an AI-Generated Test Automation for Autonomous Software Verification that maximizes test case creation, defect detection, and execution speed. The suggested framework reduces execution time (110.7 ms) and resource use (310.5 MB) while improving test coverage (94.8%), defect detection rate (91.2%), and correctness (96.7%). The AI-driven method ensures minimal human interaction by automating the production of test cases, self-healing test scripts, and adapting to changing software modifications. The Full Model (Base + ML + NLP + RL) is the most effective method, with 98.2% test coverage, 99.4% accuracy, and 95.4 ms execution time, according to performance comparisons of ML-based, NLP-based, RL-based, and combined AI-driven automation. According to the ablation study, hybrid AI models perform better than solo techniques in terms of fault discovery, testing effectiveness, and verification accuracy.",
    "ISSN": "2456-5660"
}

⬇ .json What citeproc and reference managers read; the DOI system hands it out for Accept: application/vnd.citationstyles.csl+json, and so does this registry's resolver.

From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2020.v5.i5.pp253-268 gives all four in one JSON answer.

Everything Smart Scholars runsNine sites, one account. A journal starts at the audit; an author starts at Scholar Shield.

For journals & publishers

Start with the audit — it is free, and it is the gate to everything else.

DOI care

Nine services on one journal profile — each previews first and acts only on your approval.

For authors & researchers

Free to use. Nothing you check is shared with the journal.

For institutions, sponsors & DOI operators

Smart Scholars

Mon–Sat, 10:00–19:00 IST. The Ask AI button on every page answers about our services at any hour.

News

Policies

What we can register a DOI for

20 kinds of record, one account, one place. Every one gets a DOI that resolves, metadata that indexes read, and a record that stays correct afterwards.
Journals
  • Journal articles
  • Journal titles
  • Pending publications
  • Peer reviews
  • Preprints & posted content
Books & conferences
  • Books
  • Book chapters
  • Book series
  • Book sets
  • Conference proceedings
  • Proceedings series
  • Conference papers
Other research output
  • Theses & dissertations
  • Reports & working papers
  • Report series
  • Standards
  • Databases
  • Datasets
  • Figures, tables & supplements
Funding
  • Grants & funding awards

Elsewhere

The same company, in the places our publishers already read.
Smart Scholars · Every service on one pageData from OpenAlex (openalex.org), CC0 · Crossref · ISSN Portal · DOAJContact
WhatsApp