Cite this DOI
10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53 · Codecraft Competition: Learning to Code Through Contests Using Scratch
APA (7th edition)
Longman Publishers (2020). Codecraft Competition: Learning to Code Through Contests Using Scratch. *Journal of Science & Technology*, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53
⬇ text Italics are shown as *asterisks* in plain text — the journal or book title and the volume.
BibTeX
@article{anon2020codecraft,
title = {{Codecraft Competition: Learning to Code Through Contests Using Scratch}},
journal = {Journal of Science \& Technology},
year = {2020},
month = {jun},
number = {Volume 5},
pages = {40--53},
publisher = {Longman Publishers},
issn = {2456-5660},
doi = {10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53},
url = {https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53},
language = {en},
abstract = {In this article, the design principles that guided the development of the Codecraft competition are discussed together with strategies for making the contest engaging for everyone. A random selection of 30 educators and 30 students who participated in the contests were also interviewed to find out their views about the competition and its impact on their computational thinking and creativity skills. Furthermore, 85 projects made up of codes from the Scratch program and submitted during the final round of the contest during the years 2016 to 2018 were processed using an online analytical tool known as Dr Scratch. To identify the progress made by the students, the different computational thinking concepts were analysed more deeply. The study revealed that over three years of the Codecraft competition, there was a significant improvement regarding the use of programming concepts, logic, and computational practices. Moreover, the average computational thinking (CT) score of the projects increased from 11.8 in 2016 to 14.2 in 2017 and 16.0 in 2018. Learning of computational concepts through an active contestbased approach also highlighted several advantages, such as motivation, fun, commitment, and enthusiasm, showing improvements related to creativity, computational thinking, and computational practices.}
}RIS (EndNote, Zotero, Mendeley)
TY - JOUR TI - Codecraft Competition: Learning to Code Through Contests Using Scratch JO - Journal of Science & Technology PY - 2020 DA - 2020/06/30/ IS - Volume 5 SP - 40 EP - 53 PB - Longman Publishers SN - 2456-5660 LA - en AB - In this article, the design principles that guided the development of the Codecraft competition are discussed together with strategies for making the contest engaging for everyone. A random selection of 30 educators and 30 students who participated in the contests were also interviewed to find out their views about the competition and its impact on their computational thinking and creativity skills. Furthermore, 85 projects made up of codes from the Scratch program and submitted during the final round of the contest during the years 2016 to 2018 were processed using an online analytical tool known as Dr Scratch. To identify the progress made by the students, the different computational thinking concepts were analysed more deeply. The study revealed that over three years of the Codecraft competition, there was a significant improvement regarding the use of programming concepts, logic, and computational practices. Moreover, the average computational thinking (CT) score of the projects increased from 11.8 in 2016 to 14.2 in 2017 and 16.0 in 2018. Learning of computational concepts through an active contestbased approach also highlighted several advantages, such as motivation, fun, commitment, and enthusiasm, showing improvements related to creativity, computational thinking, and computational practices. DO - 10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53 UR - https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53 ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"type": "article-journal",
"id": "10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53",
"DOI": "10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53",
"title": "Codecraft Competition: Learning to Code Through Contests Using Scratch",
"source": "Smart Scholars DOI Registry",
"container-title": "Journal of Science & Technology",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2020,
6,
30
]
]
},
"issue": "Volume 5",
"page": "40-53",
"publisher": "Longman Publishers",
"language": "en",
"abstract": "In this article, the design principles that guided the development of the Codecraft competition are discussed together with strategies for making the contest engaging for everyone. A random selection of 30 educators and 30 students who participated in the contests were also interviewed to find out their views about the competition and its impact on their computational thinking and creativity skills. Furthermore, 85 projects made up of codes from the Scratch program and submitted during the final round of the contest during the years 2016 to 2018 were processed using an online analytical tool known as Dr Scratch. To identify the progress made by the students, the different computational thinking concepts were analysed more deeply. The study revealed that over three years of the Codecraft competition, there was a significant improvement regarding the use of programming concepts, logic, and computational practices. Moreover, the average computational thinking (CT) score of the projects increased from 11.8 in 2016 to 14.2 in 2017 and 16.0 in 2018. Learning of computational concepts through an active contestbased approach also highlighted several advantages, such as motivation, fun, commitment, and enthusiasm, showing improvements related to creativity, computational thinking, and computational practices.",
"ISSN": "2456-5660"
} ⬇ .json What citeproc and reference managers read; the DOI system hands it out for Accept: application/vnd.citationstyles.csl+json, and so does this registry's resolver.
From the record as registered (version 2) — the record and its history. Programs: https://registry.smartscholars.in/api.php?action=cite&doi=10.46243%2Fjst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53 gives all four in one JSON answer.
